Analysis of a Pertinent Healthcare Issue

Analysis of a Pertinent Healthcare Issue

 

Develop a 2 to 3 page paper, written to your organization’s leadership team, addressing your selected national healthcare issue/stressor and how it is impacting your work setting. Be sure to address the following:

Analysis of a Pertinent Healthcare Issue
Analysis of a Pertinent Healthcare Issue
  • Describe the national healthcare issue/stressor you selected and its impact on your organization.
  • Use organizational data to quantify the impact (if necessary, seek assistance from leadership or appropriate stakeholders in your organization).
  • Provide a brief summary of the two articles you reviewed from outside resources on the national healthcare issue/stressor.
  • Explain how the healthcare issue/stressor is being addressed in other organizations.
  • Summarize the strategies used to address the organizational impact of national healthcare issues/stressors presented in the scholarly resources you selected.
  • Explain how they may impact your organization both positively and negatively. Be specific and provide examples.

 

Order an Analysis of a Pertinent Healthcare Issue Paper Today !

 

 

    Poor
Develop a 2-3 page paper, written to your organization’s leadership team, addressing the selected national healthcare issue/stressor and how it is impacting your work setting. Be sure to address the following:

· Describe the national healthcare issue/stressor you selected and its impact on your organization.

· Use organizational data to quantify the impact (if necessary, seek assistance from leadership or appropriate stakeholders in your organization).

23 (23%) – 25 (25%)

The response accurately and thoroughly describes the national healthcare issue/stressor selected and its impact on an organization.

The response includes accurate, clear, and detailed evidence/data to quantify the impact of the national healthcare issue/stressor selected.

18 (18%) – 19 (19%)

The response inaccurately or vaguely describes the national healthcare issue/stressor selected and its impact on an organization.

The response includes vague or inaccurate data to quantify the impact of the national healthcare issue/stressor selected.

0 (0%) – 17 (17%)

The response inaccurately and vaguely describes the national healthcare issue/stressor selected and its impact on an organization or is missing.

The response includes vague and inaccurate data to quantify the impact of the national healthcare issue/stressor selected or is missing.

· Provide a summary of the two articles you reviewed from outside resources, on the national healthcare issue/stressor.

· Explain how the healthcare issue/stressor is being addressed in other organizations.

27 (27%) – 30 (30%)

Response includes a complete, detailed, and specific summary of two outside resources (articles) reviewed on the national healthcare issue/stressor selected.

The response accurately and thoroughly explains in detail how the healthcare issue/stressor is being addressed in other organizations.

21 (21%) – 23 (23%)

Response includes a vague or inaccurate or incomplete summary of outside resources (articles) reviewed on the national healthcare issue/stressor selected.

The response vaguely or inaccurately explains how the healthcare issue/stressor is being addressed in other organizations.

0 (0%) – 20 (20%)

Response provides a vague and inaccurate summary of outside resources (articles) reviewed on the national healthcare issue/stressor selected or summary is missing.

The response vaguely and inaccurately explains how the healthcare issue/stressor is being addressed in other organizations or explanation is missing.

· Summarize the strategies used to address the organizational impact of national healthcare issues/stressors presented in the scholarly resources you selected.

· Explain how the strategies may impact your organization both positively and negatively. Be specific and provide examples.

23 (23%) – 25 (25%)

Response includes a complete, detailed, and accurate summary of the strategies used to address the organizational impact of the national healthcare issue/stressor.

Response accurately and thoroughly explains how the strategies may impact an organization both positively and negatively, with specific and accurate examples for each.

18 (18%) – 19 (19%)

Response includes a vague or inaccurate summary of the strategies used to address the organizational impact of the national healthcare issue/stressor.

Response vaguely or inaccurately explains how the strategies may impact an organization both positively and negatively.

Response may include some vague or inaccurate examples.

0 (0%) – 17 (17%)

Response provides a vague and inaccurate summary of the strategies used to address the organizational impact of the national healthcare issue/stressor or summary is missing.

Response vaguely and inaccurately explains how the strategies may impact an organization both positively and negatively or explanation is missing.

Response does not include any examples.

Resource Synthesis 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

Using proper in-text citations, the response fully integrates at least 2 outside resources and 2 or 3 course-specific resources.

3 (3%) – 3 (3%)

Using proper in-text citations, the response minimally integrates outside and course-specific resources.

0 (0%) – 2 (2%)

The response does not integrate outside and course-specific resources or no in-text citations are used.

Written Expression and Formatting—Paragraph Development and Organization:

Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided, which delineates all required criteria.

5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity.

A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion are provided, which delineates all required criteria.

3 (3%) – 3 (3%)

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60–79% of the time.

Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is vague or off topic.

0 (0%) – 2 (2%)

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity less than 60% of the time.

No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion is provided.

Written Expression and Formatting—English Writing Standards:

Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation.

5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.

3 (3%) – 3 (3%)

Contains several (three or four) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

0 (0%) – 2 (2%)

Contains many (five or more) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.

Written Expression and Formatting:

The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, running head, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.

5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

Uses correct APA format with no errors.

 

Get 20% off your first purchase

X