nurs 700 assignment 2.2 practice examplars
After completing the assigned readings, answer one question from category one and one question from category two. Be specific, give specific examples, and cite at least one source in each answer.
Your paper should be two to three pages long (not including the title page or reference page) and use correct APA 7th edition formatting.
Exemplar 1: Analyze the JBSM practice exemplar (Chapter 7, p. 102). Discuss one strength and one challenge of this model for nursing applications.
Exemplar 2: Compare the Orem practice (Chapter 8, p. 130) to aspects of your own clinical practice. Which of the three steps of Orem’s process of nursing is most challenging?
Exemplar 3: Select one of Roy’s four adaptive modes and share how it has been displayed in the practice exemplar (Chapter 10, p. 160).
Exemplar 4: Describe how Parse’s concept of true presence (Chapter 15) could apply to your practice.
Exemplar 5: Explain how the nurse practitioner in the HEC exemplar (Chapter 16, p. 287) fostered the process of expanding consciousness.
This assignment will be graded using the Assignment 2.1: Practice Exemplars Rubric found in your syllabus.
Submit your assignment and review full grading criteria on the Assignment 2.1: Practice Exemplars page.
1 Attempt Allowed
To upload your assignment, select your submission type and submit.
If needed, review the instructions for this assignment in Week 2: Integrative and Transformative Paradigms.
Assignment 2.1: Practice Exemplar Rubric
Criteria Ratings Pts
view longer description
20 to >17 pts
Fully Meets Expectations
The response for the selected exemplar has focus and the model or theory’s significance is fully explained. An additional source or sources are used, and the source integration shows sophistication and critical analysis of the material while contributing to a discussion that exhibits a thorough understanding of the model or theory.
17 to >15 pts
Generally Meets Expectations
The response for the selected exemplar is reasonably focused, and elements of the exemplar are somewhat convincing but could have greater impact. An additional source or sources are used and exhibits elements of correct understanding of the model or theory.
15 to >13 pts
Barely Meets Expectations
The response for the selected exemplar is somewhat focused, elements of the exemplar are addressed but analysis is not convincing. An additional resource is used but is superficially integrated into the response and suggests a shallow understanding of the model or theory.
13 to >0 pts
Does Not Meet Expectations
The response for selected exemplar is unfocused or confusing. Elements of the exemplar not addressed or are too briefly addressed to be meaningful. Any analysis and application of the required additional source suggests misunderstanding of the model or theory or additional source is not used in the response.
/ 20 pts
Documentation and Mechanics
view longer description
(0% deduction) Fully Meets Expectations
Documentation of sources (where appropriate) is thorough; sources are current, professional, and recognized authorities in the field; and paper adheres to APA style. Writing is fluid and free of errors in spelling, grammar, and formatting.
(02% deduction) Generally Meets Expectations
Documentation of sources (where appropriate) is adequate, most sources are of adequate academic quality, and paper adheres to APA style. Writing is reasonably fluid, with few, if any, errors in spelling, grammar, or formatting.
(05% deduction) Barely Meets Expectations
Documentation of sources (where appropriate) is sometimes inadequate, some sources are of low academic quality, or paper does not adhere to APA style. Writing is somewhat disorganized, with notable errors in spelling, grammar, and formatting.
(10% deduction) Does Not Meet Expectations
Documentation of sources (where appropriate) is absent, notably deficient, or inconsistent; sources are of poor academic quality; or paper does not adhere to APA style. Writing is disorganized with many errors in spelling, grammar, and formatting.